@conference {473,
	title = {The Anti-Ergonomy of Instruments of Interaction},
	booktitle = {Stanford HCI Seminar},
	year = {2010},
	month = {09/2010},
	publisher = {Stanford University},
	organization = {Stanford University},
	address = {Stanford, CA},
	abstract = {Antiergonomy rules. I use the idea of anti-ergonomy to pierce the veil of objects imbued with charismatic authority (holy water, iPhone, etc) and expose the often contradictory value systems of the stakeholders. A quick illustration:  Let{\textquoteright}s look at the french baguette. It has a number of features of value to the baker that are not ergonomic to the buyer. It is made of white bread and of less cost and nutritional value than whole wheat. It goes stale fast so you have to go back to the baker several times a day and it is too long to fit in bags so it sticks out advertising itself. At first glance we see two value system with some mutually beneficial aspects and some antagonistic elements. It turns out to be more subtle though. Baguettes used to be expensive (and in fact deliberately shaped to evade a law controlling bread prices) so advertising them was a benefit to purchaser (as declaration of social status) and to the baker to attract more customers. Notice that many of these value systems would not emerge when looking at the baguette functionally as an engineer or nutritionist might. This is a common situation and can be seen in its extreme form with holy water, the value of which stems from social agreement to its value established by ritual not by engineering in the usual sense.},
	url = {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbHm3DnwamM},
	author = {Freed, Adrian}
}
